GREGORY is the name of sixteen popes; namely, Gregory I., the Great (Sept. 3, 590-. March 12, 604), descended from a distinguished senatorial family, probably the Anicians, and was b. in Rome between 540 and 550. Educated in conformity with his social state, he was instructed in dialectics and rhetoric, studied law, entered the civil service, gained the confidence of the Emperor Justin, and received (about 574) the dignity of a prcetor urbis. But he also studied the Fathers of the Western Church, - Augustine, Ambrose, and Jerome. His family was markedly religious: his mother, Sylvia, and his two paternal aunts, have been canonized. The deepest instincts of his own nature revolted against the luxury and ambition of his office. lie determined to flee from the world, and become a monk. lie employed the immense wealth left to him by his fathers death to found six Benedictine monasteries in Sicily, and a seventh in his own house in Rome. In the latter he became a monk himself; and so severe were the ascetic exercises he practised, that his health became impaired, and even his life was in danger. At this moment the Pope, Pelagius II., interfered, dragged him out of the monastery by ordaining him a deacon (579), and sent him to Constantinople as apocrisiarius. The mission he fulfilled with great ability; and while in Constantinople he began his celebrated work Expositio in Job or Moralium Libri XXXV. After his return to Rome (585) he continued to take a leading part in all the business of the curia; and after the death of Pelagius II. he was unanimously elected Pope, by the clergy, the senate, and the people, and compelled to accept.
The position of the Bishop of Rome was at that time by no means an easy one. Pressed on one side by the Arian and half-barbarian Lombards, he was not free on the other, but had to yield in many ways to the authority of the Byzantine emperor and his representative in Italy, the exarch of Ravenna. Nevertheless, the position was not without its opportunities; and Gregory knew how to utilize them. The Pope was the greatest landed proprietor in Italy. From his estates, not only in Campania, Apulia, Calabria, Sicily, and Sardinia, but also in Gaul, Dalmatia, and Northern Africa, immense sums flowed into his treasury; and Gregory proved an exiellent administrator, strict, and with an eye fcr the miuutest details. To this wealth was added a certain prestige not ecclesiastical. On account of the weakness and inability of the exarchs, the Pope became the real ruler of Rome; and this role was quite natural to Gregory, who had been prætor urbis before he became Pope. Thus he stood almost as an independent power, mediating between the Lombards and the Byzantines. Through Theodelinde, a Bavarian princess, belonging to the Orthodox Church, and the wife of King Agiluif, he exercised some influence on the Lombards; though at one time (593), just while he was delivering his homilies on Ezekiel, he had to buy off Agiluif from the gates of Rome with an immense sum of gold and silver. In Constantinople, too, he could give his voice some weight; though his relations with the Emperor Mauritius became more and more troubled, especially after the controversy with John Jejunator.
John IV., Patriarch of Constantinople, liked to call himself the "oecumenical patriarch." But he was neither the first to assume this title, nor the only one to whom it had been applied: his predecessor, Menas, had borne it 536; and it had been given to Leo I. by the Council of Chalcedon 451, to Hormisdas by the Syrian monks 517, and to Boniface II. by the metropolitan of Larissa in 531. Gregory, however, who called himself sercus servorum Dei (not as a rebuke to the Constantinopolitan patriarch, but simply in imitation of Augustine), took umbrage at this title, complained of it to Mauritius (595), and attacked John IV. with a somewhat extraordinary vehemence. John died in the same year; but his successor, Cyriacus, continued the title, and Gregory became more and more irritated, especially as Mauritius declined to interfere. In November, 602, Mauritius was overthrown by Phocas; and not only was he himself beheaded, but also his wife, his five sons, and his three daughters. The new emperor, however, the usurper, the murderer, was hailed by the Pope with letters of congratulation, whose fulsomeness and flattery and adulation can be explained only on the supposition that Gregory, when he wrote the letters, was ignorant of the wanton cruelty which had accompanied the usurpation, - a supposition which, in view of the times, by no means is improbable.
In a similar way his relation to Brunehild must be explained. Brunehild was simply a monster. The crimes she committed during the reign of her son, Childebert II. (575-596), and her two grandsons, Theudebert II. and Theudenc II., earned for her the name of the "Frankish Fury," the "new Jezebel." And to this woman Gregory wrote letters full of praise and flattery. But what did he know of her? Probably nothing more than what he learnt from her own letters; and in these she simply asked for some relics for a church, or the palliurn for St. Syagrius of Autun, or a privilege for some monastery, or a papal legate to a Frankish synod; while she promised to support the English mission, to build churches and monasteries, to abolish simony, to introduce celibacy, to refrain from giving ecclesiastical offices and benefices to laymen, etc. To him Brunehild may have looked as he described her, - a very pious woman.
The two brightest points, however, in Gregorys relations with foreign countries, are Spain and England. Through the influence of Bishop Leander of Seville, an intimate friend of Gregory since they first met in Constantinople, Reccared, King of the Visigoths, was led to abandon Arianism, and join the Catholics. In a letter dated 599, the king communicated his conversion to the Pope; and at the same time he sent a goblet of gold as a present to St. Peter. Gregory answered most graciously, and sent abbot Cyriacue to Spain with the pallium to Leander. The synod of Barcelona, held in the same year under the presidency of the metropolitan Asiaticus of Tarragona, and treating the questions of simony and laymens investiture with ecclesiastical beneflees, was probably connected with the sending of Cyriacus. England had already attracted the attention of Gregory while he was yet a monk. The sight of the Anglo-Saxon boys exhibited in the slave-markets of Rome had moved him to pity, and he determined to go to England as a missionary. He actually started on the way, but was recalled by the Pope. When he became Pope himself, he sent (596) Augustine and forty other monks to King Ethelbert of Kent; and already the next year Augustine could report the baptism of the king and ten thousand of his subjects. How great an interest Gregory took in the English mission appears from his letters to Augustine, which are full of the most detailed instructions.
However successful Gregory was in extending the influence and authority of the Roman see throughout the Western countries, that which he accomplished for the internal organization and consolidation of the Church was, nevertheless, of far greater importance. The delicate question of the dependence of the Western metropolitan sees on the see of Rome, he handled with great adroitness. In North Africa, whose clergy were extremely jealous of their independence, he acted with great caution, and in strict conformity with the canons of the Council of Sardica (347). Gennadius the exarch, and the two most prominent bishops in the province, Dominicus of Carthage, and Columbus of Nuinidia, were firm friends of his; and many appeals were made to the Roman see. But the parties were never summoned to Rome: the cases were treated in loco, and by papal legates. Quite otherwise in the diocese of Ravenna. He forbade the Archbishop John, in a rather sharp manner, to wear the pallium, except when celebrating mass; and when a conflict arose between Johns successor, Marinianus, and a certain abbot, Claudius, he summoned both parties to Rome to plead their cause before him personally. He attempted the same in Illyria, on occasion of a contested episcopal election at Salona (593); but in that case the Emperor Maui-itius interfered, and to his great chagrin and humiliatioii he was compelled to make a compromise.
Gregorys ideas of a papal supremacy may have been somewhat vague; but his instincts were strong, and pointed all towards the loftiest goal. Very characteristic in this respect were his exertions to separate the monks from the clergy proper. He had been a monk himself, and he knew to what temptations and illusions human nature is exposed by monastic life: consequently he fixed the term of the novitiate at two years, and for soldiers at three. He forbade youths under eighteen years to enter a monastery, and married men, unless with the consent of their wives. He ordered all ecclesiastical officials to seize those monks, who, often in great swarms, roamed about in the country, and really were neither more nor less than tramps of the most indolent and impertinent description, and to deliver them up to the nearest monastery for punishment. Thus he did much for the reform of the monks, but he did still more for their emancipation. One monastery after the other was exempted from the episcopal authority; and at the synod of Rome (601) the power of the bishop over the abbeys was generally confined to the installation of the abbot. It was evidently his idea to form out of the monks a powerful instrumerit which might be wielded by the Pope independently of the clergy. On the other hand, he transferred some of the most marked characteristics of monastic life to the clergy, as, for instance, the celibacy, for whose introduction he was exceedingly anxious. For the clergy he wrote, shortly after his accession to the papal throne, his famous book, Regula Pastoralis, which for centuries was regarded as the moral code of the clergy. The Emperor Mauritius had it translated into Greek (Alfred the Great translated it himself into Anglo-Saxon), and Hinemar of Rheims states in 870 that every Frankish bishop took an oath on it at his consecration. Preaching he considered as the principal duty of the priest, and he gave in this respect a brilliant example himself. Besides the above-mentioned homilies on Ezekiel, forty homilies on the Gospels have come down to us.
As a theologian Gregory was without originality: nevertheless he exercised also in this field a beneficial influence by spreading the interest in Augustine. he is sometimes called the "inventor of purgatory;" but, though his doctrines of an intermediate state between death and doom are very explicit, they are hardly more than modifications of the ideas of Augustine. His dogmatical views he set forth in his Dialogorum de vita et rniraculis patrum Italicorum et de oeternitate animarum. Otherwise, with his influence on the ceremonial side of Christianity, it amounted at some points to a complete revolution. It is doubtful how much of the Sacrementarium Gregorianum really belongs to Gregory, and how much has been borrowed from the Sacramentarium of Gelasius I. The case is somewhat similar with respect to his Liber Antiphonarius. Nevertheless, it is beyond doubt that he founded a singing-school in Rome, the effect of which was that the Gregorian Chant, the cantus planus, with its grave, solemn rhythm, all tones having equal length, superseded the Ambrosian Chant, the cantus figuratus.
H. Ashworth, "Further Parallels to the 'Hadrianum' from St. Gregory the Great's Commentary on the First Book of Kings," Traditio 16 (1960): 364-73. | |
Matthew Baasten, Pride According to Gregory the Great. Studies in the Bible and Early Christianity. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1986. Hbk. ISBN: 0889466068. pp.216. | |
James Barmby [1822-1897], Gregory the Great. The Fathers of the Church for English Readers. London: SPCK, 1879. Hbk. pp.207. pdf [This material is in the Public Domain] | |
William Bright [1824-1901], Chapters of Early English Church History, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888. Hbk. pp.476. [This material is in the Public Domain] | |
F.F. Bruce, "Literature and Theology to Gregory the Great," Journal of Ecclesiastical History 18 (1967): 227-31. | |
John C. Cavadini, ed., Gregory the Great. University of Notre Dame Press, 1996. Hbk. ISBN: 0268010307. pp.248. | |
Francis Clark, The Pseudo-Gregorian Dialogues. Studies in the History of Christian Thought, 37-8. Leiden: E J Brill, 1987. Hbk. ISBN: 9004077731. Cf. article by Paul Meyvaert (below). | |
Pearse Cusack, An Interpretation of the Second Dialogue of Gregory the Great. Edwin Mellen Press, 1993. Pbk. ISBN: 0773492720. pp.204. | |
M. Dando, "The Moralia in Job of Gregory the Great as a Source for Old Saxon Genesis B," Classica et mediaevalia 30 (1969, ed. 1974): 420-39. | |
P.A. DeLeeuw, "Gregory the Great's 'Homilies on the Gospels' in the Early Middle Ages," Studi medievali 26 (1985): 855-69. | |
Frederick Homes Dudden, Gregory the Great, 2 Vols. New York: Russell & Russell / London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1905. pp. vi + 473. | |
G.R. Evans, "Guibert Of Nogent And Gregory The Great On Preaching And Exegesis." Thomist 49.4 (1985): 534-550. | |
G.R. Evans, The Thought of Gregory the Great, new edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Pbk. ISBN: 052136826X. pp.176. | |
David Hipshon, "Gregory the Great's 'Political Thought.' " Journal of Ecclesiastical History 53.3 (2002): 439-453. | |
J.E. Lawyer, "Longing that Loss in the Life of St. Benedict According to Gregory the Great," American Benedictine Review 54.1 (2003): 72-95. | |
Lester K. Little, "Calvin's Appreciation of Gregory the Great," Harvard Theological Review 56 (1963): 146-157. | |
F. Donald Logan, A History of the Church in the Middle Ages. London & New York: Routledge, 2002. Pbk. ISBN: 0415132894. pp.47-51. | |
Peter McEniery, "Pope Gregory the Great and Infallibility," Journal of Ecumenical Studies 11.2 (1974): 263-280. | |
R.A. Markus, "The Chronology of the Gregorian Mission to England: Bede's Narrative and Gregory's Correspondence," Journal of Ecclesiastical History 14 (1963): 16-30. | |
R.A. Markus, "Gregory the Great and a Papal Missionary Strategy," G.J. Cuming, ed.,The Mission of the Church and the Propagation of th Faith. Papers read at the Seventh summer meeting and eighth winter meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society. Studies in Church History, Vol. 6. . Cambridge: Cambridge UNiversity Press,1970. Hbk. pp.29-38. | |
R.A. Markus, Gregory the Great and His World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Hbk. ISBN: 0521584302. pp.265. | |
Paul Meyvaert, "Diversity within Unity: A Gregorian Theme," Heythrop Journal 4 (1963): 141-62. A rebuttal of Francis Clark's work (above). | |
Paul Meyvaert, "The Date of Gregory the Great's Commentaries on the Canticle of Canticles and on 1 Kings," Sacris erudiri: Jaarboak voor Godsdienstwetenschappen 23 (1978s): 191-216. | |
Paul Meyvaert, "Uncovering a Lost Work of Gregory the Great: Fragments of the Early Commentary on Job," Traditio 50 (1995): 55-74. | |
Dag Norberg, Critical and Exegetical Notes on the Letters of St. Gregory the Great. Stockholm: Museum of Natural Antiquities, 1982. Pbk. ISBN: 9174021486. pp.33. | |
Joan M. Peterson, "The Identification of the Titulus Fasciolae and Its Connection With Pope Gregory the Great," Vigiliae Christianae 30.2 (1976): 151-158. | |
Jeffrey Richards, Consul of God: Life and Times of Gregory the Great. London: Routledge, 1980. Hbk. ISBN: 0710003463. pp.320. | |
Alfred C. Rush, "Spiritual Martyrdom in Gregory the Great," Theological Studies 23 (1962): 569-589. | |
S.E. Schreiner, "'Where Shall Wisdom Be Found?': Gregory's Interpetation of Job," American Benedictine Review 39 (1988): 321-42. | |
Carole Ellen Straw, Gregory the Great: Perfection in Imperfection. Berkeley, CA & London: University of California Press, 1988. Hbk. ISBN: 0520057678. pp.309. | |
E.F. Sutcliffe, "A Note on Gregory's Hom. 13 in Evangelia," Irish Theological Quarterly 27 (1960): 69ff. | |
Roger G. Tweed, "The Psychology of Gregory the Great (A.D. 540-A.D. 604)," International Journal for Psychology of Religion 7.2 (1997): 101-110. | |
G.S.M. Walker, The Growing Storm. Sketches of Church History from A.D. 600 to A.D. 1350. London: The Paternoster Press, 1961. Hbk. pp.252. pdf [All reasonable efforts have been made to contact the copyright holder of this article without success. If you hold the rights, please contact me] | |
L. Michael White, "Transcationalism in the Penitential Thought of Gregory the Great," Restoration Quarterly 21.1 (1978): 33-51. | |
W.J. Wilkins, "'Submitting the Neck of Your Mind'; Gregory the Great and Women of Power," Catholic Historical Review 77 (1991): 583-94. |