Charlemagne (c.742 - 814)
Theology on the Web helps over 2.5 million people every year to find high quality theological resources that will help to equip them to serve God and to know Him better (2 Timothy 2:15). Like other websites that provide free services, it is dependent on donations to enable it to grow and develop and only 0.004% of visitors currently do so. If you would like to support this site, please use one of the options to the right of this message.
Synopsis
CHARLEMAGNE, b. April 2, 742; d. Jan. 28, 814; succeeded, together with his younger brother Carloman, his father, Pepin the Short, as King of the Franks in 768; became sole ruler of the Frankish Empire by Carloman’s death in 774; was crowned Roman emperor by Leo III. in the Church of St. Peter in Rome, Christmas Day, 800, and stood, in the latter part of his reign, as one of the three great rulers of the world, the equal of the Emperor of Constantinople, and the Caliph of Bagdad.
No layman has exercised so great an influence on the history of the Church as Charlemagne; though his influence was, properly speaking, merely that of extension, organization. and consolidation. Personally he probably did not reach far beyond a tolerably accurate fulfilment of the precepts of the Church. His character has, no doubt, been much embellished by the legendary poetry of the Church. His want of chastity, and disregard of the marriage-vow, must be freely admitted. Practically the Church was to him, not only the visible representative of Christ on earth, but also an organ of civilization, an instrument of government; and he was sometimes unscrupulous enough in the use of this instrument, as, for instance, when he compelled the Saxons, by force and with unexampled cruelty, to receive baptism. Nevertheless he contributed perhaps more than any one else to make the Church a power in the history of the race, and enabled it to form during the middle ages a much-needed and highly beneficial counterpoise to the military despotism of feudalism.
His relation to the Church is strikingly characterized by a total absence of any distinction between spiritual and temporal power. Both were identical to him; and as he unquestionably was the holder of the one he necessarily came to consider himself as holder of the other too. Without paying the least regard to the Pope, whom, under other circumstances, he was not unwilling to recognize as the representative of the Church, he condemned at the synod of Francfort (794) the decrees of the second council of Nicaea concerning image-worship, and with as little ceremony he introduced the Filioque of the Spanish churches into the Nicene Creed at the synod of Aix-la-Chapelle (809). He was liberal to the Church. The exarchate of Ravenna was his splendid donation to the papal see. Churches and monasteries received enormous endowments everywhere in his. realm; and the first business he took in hand after conquering a new territory was the formation of dioceses, the building of churches, the foundation of missionary-stations, etc. But of this church, made great and rich by his liberality, he demanded absolute obedience. The metropolitans received the pallium from the Pope, but only with his consent; and the bishops he chose and appointed himself alone. He would have been very much surprised if any one had intimated to him - what, a century later on, was preached from the roofs - that there was within the Church a spiritual power to which even the emperor owed obedience. Church and State were one to him. His idea of government was theocratic, with the distinction, though, that, in his case, it was not the Church which had absorbed the State, but the State which identified. itself with the Church.
Nothing shows more plainly than the circle of great men which gathered around Charlemagne that the principal problem which he expected the Church to solve had a general civilizing bearing. All the great men of his age, such as Alcuin, Leidrade, Angilbert, Eginhard, Agobard, Paschasins Radbertus, Rabanus Maurus, Scotus Erigena Hincmar, were connected, either as teachers or as pupils, with that school which he had founded in his palace, and which became the fertile germ of the medieval university. All these men were theologians, but not exclusively: on the contrary, their greatness was their many-sidedness. They had studied grammar, rhetoric, philosophy, classical literature, canon law, etc. They were poets, philosophers, statesmen, practical administrators, etc. They were exactly what Charlemagne wanted, - men whom he could send out as legates to see how the counts were doing in the marches, or could settle as bishops in a diocese to take care, not only of the Church proper, but also of the school and the court; for, according to his ideas, the Church was an institution with many worldly duties of education and jurisdiction; and consequently it became, under his hands, an institution with many worldly interests of property and ambition.
Clemens Petersen, "Charlemagne," Philip Schaff, ed., A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology, 3rd edn, Vol. 1. Toronto, New York & London: Funk & Wagnalls Company, 1894. pp.436-437.
Primary Sources
Abbot of Seligenstadt Einhard & Balbulus
Notker, Two Lives of Charlemagne, Lewis Thorpe, ed, new edn.
Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1969. Pbk. ISBN: 0140442138. pp.240.
Secondary Sources
Rosamund McKitterick, The
Frankish Kingdoms under the Carolingians 751-987. Longman, 1983. Pbk. ISBN:
0582490057. pp.59-105.
Robert Morrissey, Charlemagne and France, Catherine Tihanyi, translator. University of
Notre Dame Press, 2002. Hbk. ISBN: 0268022771. pp.456.
David Nicolle, The Age of Charlemagne.
Osprey Publishing Compnay, 2000. Pbk. ISBN: 1841761257. pp.48.
J.M. Wallace-Hadrill, The
Frankish Church. Oxford History of the Christian Church. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1983. Hbk. ISBN: 0198269064. pp.150-61.Related Subjects
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Peter Abelard | Aelfric | Alcuin |Anselm | Augustine of Canterbury | Thomas Becket | Bede | Benedict | Bernard of Clairvaux | Boniface | Thomas Bradwardine | Bruno | Catherine of Siena | Charlemagne | Charles Martel | Clare | Clovis | Columba | Dominic | Duns Scotus | Dunstan | Meister Eckhart | Desiderius Erasmus | Francis of Assisi | Gottschalk | Gregory I | Gregory of Rimini | Gregory of Tours | Hildegard of Bingen | Hugo of St Victor | Ignatius Loyola | Innocent III | Isidore | Joachim of Fiore | John Huss | John of Damascus | John of Wesel | Jerome of Prague | Julian of Norwich | Marjory Kempe | Ramon Llull | Nicholas of Cusa | Nicholas of Lyre | Patrick | Pepin (Pippin III) | Peter Damian | Peter Lombard | Peter the Venerable | Photius | Richard Rolle | Scholastica | Thomas Aquinas | Wilfred | William of Ockham | William of St-Theirry | John Wycliffe
ABOUT | SITE MAP | SUPPORT | INTRODUCTIONS | COUNCILS | CRUSADES | DOCTRINE & PRACTICE | EXPANSION | HERESIES | OTHER FAITHS | PAPACY | PEOPLE | RELIGIOUS ORDERS | BLOG | BOOKS | STUDY AIDS | SITEMAP | CONTACT
